Opal vs Frigidaire EFIC237 Nugget Ice Maker
A side by side look at how the Frigidaire EFIC237 nugget maker measures up to the GE Profile Opal on output, bin, tank, and cleaning.
Key takeaways
- Both the Opal and Frigidaire EFIC237 make real soft nugget ice, so neither is a bad choice
- The Frigidaire is rated for higher output but has a smaller bin, so you scoop more often
- The Opal offers a larger bin, an optional side tank, and app control the Frigidaire lacks
- Neither machine freezes its bin, so both recirculate melt and stop when the bin is full
- The Frigidaire usually costs less, while the Opal earns its price with extras and a longer track record
The first time a friend asked me which nugget machine to buy, she had two boxes sitting on her kitchen floor. One was the GE Profile Opal, the countertop machine that made this soft pebble ice a thing people obsess over. The other was the Frigidaire EFIC237, the newer challenger that costs less and promises the same chewable ice.
She wanted to keep one and return the other. So I ran them both on her counter for a week, side by side, same filtered water, same room.
That week is where most of this opal vs frigidaire nugget comparison comes from. Both make real nugget ice. They just get there differently, and a few of those differences will actually matter to you day to day.
The two machines at a glance
Here is the short version before the details. The Opal is the established name with a bigger accessory ecosystem and a side tank option. The Frigidaire EFIC237 is the value pick that gets you real nugget ice for less money, with a smaller footprint and a smaller bin.
| Spec | GE Profile Opal 2.0 | Frigidaire EFIC237 |
|---|---|---|
| Ice per day (rated) | Up to 24 lb | Up to 33 lb |
| Ice per day (real world) | Around 18-22 lb | Around 20-26 lb |
| Bin capacity | About 3 lb | About 2 lb |
| Built-in reservoir | Around 20 oz plus optional side tank | Around 22 oz, no side tank |
| First nugget | Around 15-20 min | Around 15-20 min |
| Self-clean cycle | Yes, guided | Yes, basic |
| App and WiFi | Yes (Opal 2.0) | No |
| Typical price | Higher | Lower |
Numbers on the box are lab numbers. On a normal counter in a normal kitchen, both land lower than their rating, which is completely normal. If you are still deciding whether a pebble machine fits your life at all, start with my broader nugget ice maker guide and come back.
Ice output and how fast the bin fills
On paper the Frigidaire wins output. It is rated higher, and in my week it did edge ahead on total pounds over a full day of running. If you host, or you have a couple of heavy chewers in the house, that extra capacity shows up.
The Opal is not slow, though. Its rated 24 pounds is honest for a countertop unit, and in practice it kept a full glass coming all afternoon without me thinking about it.
Here is the catch that spec sheets hide. Neither machine freezes. The bin is insulated, not refrigerated, so ice melts back into the tank and gets refrozen. That means a fuller bin does not equal more ready ice if you are not using it. Both machines recirculate that melt, which is just how these units work.
Rated pounds per day assume the bin is emptied constantly. Leave either machine full and it stops making ice until you scoop some out. That is not a defect. It is how every countertop nugget maker works.

Bin size, tank, and refill rhythm
This is where the machines feel different in daily use. The Opal holds about 3 pounds of nugget in its bin. The Frigidaire holds closer to 2. So even though the Frigidaire makes ice faster, it holds less at once, and you scoop more often.
The tanks are close, both in the 20 to 22 ounce range for the built-in reservoir. The real split is the Opal side tank.
The Opal side tank advantage
The Opal 2.0 accepts an add-on side tank that roughly triples how long it runs before a refill. If you hate topping off water, that is a genuine convenience the Frigidaire has no answer for. I go deeper on what it does and who needs it in the write-up on the nugget ice maker side tank.
Without the side tank, the two are similar. You refill the Opal a little less often thanks to the bigger bin buffering demand, but not dramatically so.
If you refill water gladly, this gap barely matters. If refilling annoys you, the Opal with a side tank is the only one of these two that fixes it.
Ice quality and taste
Both make the good stuff. Small, soft, cloudy nuggets that soak up your drink and crunch instead of crack. If you handed me a cup blind, I would struggle to name which machine made it.
If I push, the Opal nugget felt a hair softer and slightly more uniform across the week. The Frigidaire nuggets ran a touch firmer and a little more varied in size, especially early in a batch. Neither is bad. Both beat the hard cubes from a fridge dispenser by a mile.
Water matters more than the machine here. Hard water muddies flavor and speeds up scale in both. If your tap runs hard, a filter helps, and you can check your area against the USGS explainer on water hardness before you blame the ice maker.
Cleaning and maintenance
Every recirculating nugget maker needs regular cleaning, because the same water cycles through warm plastic all day. Skip it and you get slime, smell, and slow output. That is true of both units.
The Opal has a more guided self-clean routine, and its light tells you when a cycle is due. The Frigidaire has a self-clean mode too, but it is more basic and leans on you to remember. Both use a water plus cleaner solution run through the system, then a rinse.
The most common mistake I see is treating self-clean as a full clean. It is not. You still have to hand wipe the bin, scoop, and reservoir. Self-clean handles the plumbing you cannot reach, not the parts you can.
For the step by step on what the cycle actually does inside the machine, I lay it out in the guide on the nugget ice maker self-clean cycle. Keeping either machine safe to eat from comes down to routine, and general food and water hygiene basics from the CDC on healthy water apply to ice too.
Noise, size, and where it fits
Neither is silent. Both hum and clatter as nuggets drop, and both cycle a compressor that kicks on and off. In a quiet kitchen you hear them. In a room with any background noise you forget they are on.
The Frigidaire has a smaller footprint, which helps if counter space is tight. The Opal is a bit larger and taller, and it needs breathing room at the vents. Cram either into a cabinet nook with no airflow and output drops while the compressor works harder, so leave a few inches around the vents.
- Leave a few inches of clearance at the back and sides of either unit
- Keep both off a hot spot like next to an oven or in direct sun
- Empty the bin daily even if you did not use much ice
- Run a clean cycle roughly every one to two weeks
App control and extras
The Opal 2.0 connects to WiFi and an app. You can start ice, schedule it, and get a nudge when the water is low or a clean is due. It is not essential, but it is pleasant, and it is a real feature the Frigidaire lacks.
The Frigidaire keeps it simple with buttons on the unit and no connectivity. For plenty of people that is a plus, not a miss. If app control is something you actually care about, I compare how useful it really is in the piece on nugget ice maker app and WiFi control.
Price and value
The Frigidaire EFIC237 usually costs less, sometimes a good bit less. For that you get real nugget ice, higher rated output, and a smaller footprint, minus the side tank, app, and the polish of the Opal name.
The Opal costs more and earns it if you want the side tank, the app, the larger bin, and a machine with a long track record and easy to find parts. Running costs between the two are close, since both are countertop compressors in a similar power range, and I break those down in the guide on nugget ice maker daily run cost.
Making the call
Both machines pass the only test that matters, which is that they make genuine soft nugget ice that chewers love. This is not a case where one is a mistake.
Get the Frigidaire EFIC237 if you want the lowest price for real nugget ice, you do not care about an app, and a smaller bin with more frequent scooping does not bother you. Get the GE Profile Opal if you want the bigger bin, the side tank for hands off refills, the app, and the reassurance of the more established platform. My friend kept the Opal, mostly for the side tank, and returned the Frigidaire. Yours might go the other way, and either choice is a fine one.
Frequently asked questions
Yes, both produce true soft, chewable nugget ice, not hard cubes. In my side by side testing the two were nearly impossible to tell apart in a cup. The Opal nuggets felt a hair softer and more uniform, but the difference is small.
The Frigidaire EFIC237 is rated higher, up to about 33 pounds per day versus the Opal's 24, and it did edge ahead on total output in my test. Both land below their rated numbers in real kitchens, which is normal. First nuggets appear in about 15 to 20 minutes for either machine.
No, the Frigidaire EFIC237 has no side tank option. The Opal 2.0 accepts an add-on side tank that roughly triples run time between refills. If avoiding frequent water top offs matters to you, that is a real point in the Opal's favor.
Yes, both recirculate water through warm plastic all day, so both need cleaning every one to two weeks to avoid slime, odor, and slow output. Each has a self-clean mode, though the Opal's is more guided. Self-clean does not replace hand washing the bin, scoop, and reservoir.
It depends on what you value. The Opal costs more but adds a bigger bin, the side tank, app and WiFi control, and a longer track record with easy to find parts. If you want the lowest price for real nugget ice and do not care about those extras, the Frigidaire is the better value.
Neither is silent, and both clatter as nuggets drop and cycle a compressor on and off. In a quiet room you notice them, but with any background noise they fade out. Neither was loud enough to bother me during a week on the kitchen counter.
