GE Opal vs Frigidaire Nugget Ice Maker
Two popular nugget machines, one countertop. Here is how the GE Opal 2.0 and the Frigidaire EFIC237 actually compare on output, tank, app, noise, and price.
Key takeaways
- The Frigidaire EFIC237 makes more ice per day for less money, roughly 26 to 32 real pounds versus 18 to 22 for the Opal.
- The GE Opal 2.0 wins on the side tank, app scheduling, and quieter operation.
- The Opal runs several decibels softer, which matters in an open kitchen.
- Hard water and skipped cleaning cause most output problems, not the machine itself.
- Pick the Opal for convenience and hosting, the Frigidaire for output on a budget.
I have had both of these machines sitting on my counter at the same time, running back to back, filling the same little glasses with the same chewable pellets. That is the only real way to settle the opal vs frigidaire nugget ice maker question, because on paper they look closer than they feel in a kitchen.
One of them is the machine everyone points to when they picture nugget ice at home. The other is the value pick that keeps showing up in carts because it costs less and still makes the good stuff.
So let me walk you through what I saw, heard, and measured, and then help you pick the one that fits your counter and your budget.
The two machines at a glance
The GE Profile Opal 2.0 is the follow-up to the original Opal that basically made countertop nugget ice a thing people wanted. It leans on a side tank, an app, and a light-up window.
The Frigidaire EFIC237 is the scrappier option. It skips most of the extras and focuses on making a decent pile of nuggets for less money, which is why it shows up so often in my roundup of the best nugget ice maker picks under $500.
| Spec | GE Profile Opal 2.0 | Frigidaire EFIC237 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily output (claimed) | Up to 24 lb | Up to 44 lb |
| Realistic daily output | 18-22 lb | 26-32 lb |
| Bin capacity | About 3 lb | About 2 lb |
| Side tank | Yes, holds about 60 oz | No side tank |
| App and WiFi | Yes | No |
| Power draw | Around 180-200 watts running | Around 150-170 watts running |
| Noise (my meter, 3 ft) | 42-46 dB | 48-52 dB |
| Street price | Roughly $500-580 | Roughly $340-420 |
Daily output: how much ice you actually get
The spec sheets are optimistic for both machines, the way spec sheets always are. Those numbers come from a cold room with cold water, not your July kitchen.
In my testing at normal room temperature with tap water around 70 degrees, the Opal 2.0 gave me roughly 18 to 22 pounds across a full day of refills. The Frigidaire pushed closer to 26 to 32 pounds, which surprised me the first time because I expected the pricier machine to win everything.
Here is the catch though. The Frigidaire has a smaller bin, so it fills up fast and then stops making ice until you scoop some out. If nobody is home to empty it, that big output number never really shows up in your glass. If you want to size this properly for your household, I broke down the math in a piece on how much ice per day you actually need.

The side tank changes the whole routine
This is the feature that quietly separates the two. The Opal 2.0 can take a side tank that holds about 60 ounces of water, which feeds the machine so you are not topping off the reservoir every couple of hours.
The Frigidaire has no side tank. You pour water into the internal reservoir, and when it runs dry, the machine stops and beeps at you.
If you host often or you want ice waiting when you wake up, the side tank is the single best reason to pay more for the Opal. It turns a babysitting job into a set-it-and-check-it-later machine.
For a small household that makes ice on demand, the tank matters less. For a busy kitchen with kids grabbing drinks all afternoon, it is the difference between calm and constant refilling.
App control: nice, not necessary
The Opal 2.0 connects to WiFi and pairs with the SmartHQ app. From my phone I could start a batch, schedule ice for the morning, turn on the light ring, and run a cleaning cycle without walking to the counter.
Is any of that essential? No. But scheduling ice to be ready by 7 a.m. is genuinely pleasant, and I used it more than I expected to.
The Frigidaire has physical buttons and nothing else. Press to make ice, press to stop. Some people prefer that, and honestly there is less to break. If app control is not on your must-have list, spend that money elsewhere, a point I make in my rundown of the ice maker specs that actually matter.
Noise: which one you can live with
Both machines hum, gurgle, and occasionally drop a load of ice with a clatter. That is just how nugget makers work.
With my meter three feet away, the Opal 2.0 sat around 42 to 46 decibels, closer to a quiet fridge. The Frigidaire ran a touch louder at 48 to 52 decibels, with a sharper compressor tone that carried more.
In an open kitchen that flows into the living room, the Opal fades into the background. The Frigidaire reminds you it is there.
Neither is loud enough to ruin a room, but if quiet matters to you, the Opal wins this one. I go deeper on sound in my guide to the best quiet ice maker for open kitchens.
Running cost and water use
Neither machine will wreck your power bill, but they are not free to run either. The Opal draws around 180 to 200 watts while making ice, the Frigidaire a bit less at 150 to 170 watts.
Run either one several hours a day and you are looking at somewhere around $3 to $6 a month in electricity for most people, depending on your rate. If you like to keep an eye on efficiency, the Department of Energy energy saver resources are a decent reality check on what small appliances actually cost to run.
Both machines recycle melting ice back into the reservoir, so they waste less water than you would guess. Neither is a big draw on your bill. I compared the numbers across brands in my nugget ice maker running cost comparison.
Cleaning and hard water
Nugget makers need regular cleaning or they slow down and start tasting off. The Opal makes this easier with an app-guided clean cycle and a clear reminder schedule. The Frigidaire wants you to remember on your own and run a vinegar or citric-acid rinse by hand.
If you live somewhere with hard water, both machines will scale up faster, and that is the number one reason people think their new ice maker died. You can check your local water hardness through the USGS water science school, and if your numbers are high, plan on descaling more often.
The most common mistake I see: people run these on hard tap water and never descale, then blame the machine when output drops by half. A monthly clean fixes almost all of it. Hard water folks should read my notes on the best ice maker for hard water areas.
Which buyer should get which
Here is how I sort it when friends ask me, because the right pick really does depend on the kitchen.
- Get the Opal 2.0 if you want the side tank, quieter operation, app scheduling, and you host or entertain often.
- Get the Frigidaire EFIC237 if you want more raw output for less money and you do not care about WiFi or a light ring.
- Get the Opal if quiet matters, since it runs several decibels softer in an open room.
- Get the Frigidaire if budget is tight and you are happy to scoop and refill by hand.
If you are still deciding between nugget and other ice shapes altogether, back up one step and read my breakdown of nugget vs bullet vs cube ice makers before you spend a dollar.
Making the call
Both of these are good machines, and I would happily keep either on my counter. The Frigidaire EFIC237 gives you more ice per day and saves you well over a hundred dollars, which is a real argument for a big, thirsty household on a budget.
The GE Profile Opal 2.0 costs more, but the side tank, the quieter run, and the app add up to a machine you fuss over less. For most people who want nugget ice to be easy and pleasant, that is worth the premium.
Whichever way you lean, match the machine to how your kitchen actually runs, not to the biggest number on the box. If you want a wider framework for that decision, my full guide to choosing an ice maker lays out every factor in order of what matters most.
Frequently asked questions
In my testing at normal room temperature, yes. The Opal produced about 18 to 22 pounds a day while the Frigidaire pushed 26 to 32 pounds. The Frigidaire has a smaller bin though, so it fills and pauses more often, which can eat into that advantage if nobody empties it.
If you host or want ice ready in the morning, it is the best reason to pay more. The tank holds about 60 ounces and feeds the machine so you refill far less often. For a small household making ice on demand, it matters much less.
No. The Opal has physical controls and works fine without WiFi. The app adds scheduling, remote start, light control, and cleaning reminders, which are nice conveniences rather than requirements.
The Opal 2.0 is quieter. On my meter three feet away it read about 42 to 46 decibels, while the Frigidaire ran closer to 48 to 52 with a sharper compressor tone. Neither is loud enough to ruin a room, but the Opal fades into the background better.
Plan on a descale and clean roughly once a month, more if you have hard water. Skipping this is the top reason output drops and people think the machine failed. The Opal guides you through it in the app, while the Frigidaire relies on you to remember.
Both can, but hard water scales them faster and slows ice production. Check your local water hardness and descale more often if your numbers are high. A filtered water source also helps taste and reduces buildup over time.
